Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory119 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190924
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 14:22
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 183
65% 115 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 653
60% 503 Pts
64-Core 1,398
87% 1,398 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
HP(103C 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.6% Below average
Lighting 46.3
Reflection 78.5
Parallax 42.7
38% 55.8 fps
MRender 47.9
Gravity 50.6
Splatting 57.3
43% 51.9 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FTM48N325H 480GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 205 235 11 74 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 473
Write 371
Mixed 348
SusWrite 91.5
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.4
43% 10.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 91%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
387GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2029 955 817 820 819 820 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,470
Write 2,153
Mixed 1884
SusWrite 1,043
422% 1,888 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 73.4
240% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 420
DQ Mixed 594
435% 576 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 263%
Great: 346%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
247GB free
Firmware: 1002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 132 134 131 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 117
Write 103
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 129
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
343% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 106%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 139 139 145 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 103
Write 126
Mixed 104
SusWrite 142
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
398% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 71%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93.5% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 33.4
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 17.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback