Biostar B360MHD PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar B360MHD PRO  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180816
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 13:59
Run Duration366 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 751
78% 628 Pts
64-Core 740
46% 740 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 2471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 194
Parallax 180
140% 182 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 139
Splatting 132
111% 137 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gamer L TA1D0240A 240GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 9.9 8.5 124 114 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 310
Write 121
Mixed 208
SusWrite 116
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 35
128% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 194
166% 242 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
827GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 170 169 172 171 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 126
Write 107
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 169
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360MHD PRO Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Biostar B360MHD PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback