Lenovo 2349OB6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2349OB6  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2349OB6
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190807
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 09:52
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 66
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 150
58% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 216
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 3
3% 3.03 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.2
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HX256GSSDSATA3 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1120A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 349 99 17 63 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 413
Write 334
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 122
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 0.4
24% 7.93 MB/s
DQ Read 46.4
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 0.4
8% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2349OB6 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2349OB6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $408
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback