Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 48% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSamsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP270E5E-X02HU
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín, 1024x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '21 at 06:49
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 29%
CPU Throttled 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 31.6
2-Core 47
35% 48.5 Pts
4-Core 75.1
8-Core 81.7
10% 78.4 Pts
64-Core 80.4
5% 80.4 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C709) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 2.7
3% 3.63 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 68 44 41 55 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 431
Write 337
Mixed 313
SusWrite 74.8
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 18.9
64% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 101
93% 142 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
279GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 68 67 69 66 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 56.9
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 67
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 M471B5773CHS-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 12.2
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback