Colorful H310M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemColorful H310M-E  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful H310M-E
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateNov 05 '21 at 22:52
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$243
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 82.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 267
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 645
72% 569 Pts
64-Core 650
40% 650 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Device(7377 0000) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.2% Below average
Lighting 30.5
Reflection 45.7
Parallax 58.1
25% 44.8 fps
MRender 50.2
Gravity 60.5
Splatting 58.1
46% 56.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 512GB 512GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 69 63 57 47 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Write 193
Mixed 29
SusWrite 58.2
22% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
3% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.7% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 24.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 21.1
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M-E Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Colorful H310M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback