Medion ERAZER X5317 I/C041

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 70% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	97.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion ERAZER X5317 I/C041 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION Z170H4-EA
Memory	15.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151111
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '21 at 21:45
Run Duration	294 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 124 2-Core 209 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 575 63% 500 Pts	64-Core 570 35% 570 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3362) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 142 Parallax 132 108% 135 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 140 Splatting 119 102% 125 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$146 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 934GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 350 387 399 422 421 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 427 Mixed 364 SusWrite 386 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 41 127% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 287 233% 331 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 125%
Ct2000mx 50 2TB 761 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 611GB free Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 105 104 107 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 335 Write 313 Mixed 305 SusWrite 105 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 69.1 4K Mixed 35.3 125% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 210 159% 214 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 65GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 86 93 103 99 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 97.8 Write 71.8 Mixed 66 SusWrite 92.5 61% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 112%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1GB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.8 1.9 2 1.9 2 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.81% Terrible	Read 0.5 Write 4 Mixed 3.2 SusWrite 1.8 2% 2.38 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.3 70% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 0.81% Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 80GB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 98 142 139 132 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Read 111 Write 111 Mixed 54.3 SusWrite 106 70% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 98GB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 102 99 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 100 Write 102 Mixed 50.9 SusWrite 101 65% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 109%
Seagate Game Drive Xbox 8TB 760 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 6TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 71 86 87 80 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 158 Write 119 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 82.5 72% 99 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 147% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 93%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 90GB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 87 95 98 96 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 150 Write 152 Mixed 66.6 SusWrite 92.6 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 285% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 115GB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 99 99 98 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 125 Write 121 Mixed 60 SusWrite 98.5 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 109%
Toshiba HDWG21C 12TB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 37GB free Firmware: 0601 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 101 101 104 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 110 Write 92.4 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 101 65% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 134%
WD My Book 25ED 8TB 458 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 7TB free, PID 25ed Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 189 185 191 197 190 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 202 Write 208 Mixed 126 SusWrite 187 243% 181 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1.7 216% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 95%
SDXC Card 128GB 9,908 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 117GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 32 31 31 32 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 20.7 Write 24 Mixed 22 SusWrite 26.8 33% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 76% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBR2 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1315 BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBR2 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 32GB 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	67.3% Good	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 23.4 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 25.9 SC Mixed 22.6 57% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 79 51% 79 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X5317 I/C041 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 71%

Battleship

System: Medion ERAZER X5317 I/C041

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	2x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GBSamsungBench 98%, 467 samples	3x
MX500 2TBCrucial $146Bench 108%, 44,787 samples	1x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 8,407 samples	3x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	1x
BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBR2 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1315 BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBR2 Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 32GBUnknownBench 67%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $580

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16