Insys CD9-G156

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemInsys CD9-G156  (all builds)
MotherboardINSYS CD9-G156
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200608
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateNov 05 '21 at 20:07
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
26.8% Poor
Memory 21.1
1-Core 50.6
2-Core 93.9
29% 55.2 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 176
25% 182 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(1E50 8003) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6813
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.2
0% 1.4 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-S400U-240-80 240GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFME1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 8.6 9.3 11 70 34 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.6% Below average
Read 212
Write 107
Mixed 143
SusWrite 30.7
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 7
48% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 92.9
95% 156 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
22.9% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 313
13% 313 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CD9-G156 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Insys CD9-G156

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback