Gigabyte GA-Z270N-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	61.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270N-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180309
Uptime	12.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '21 at 19:21
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Memory 94.6 1-Core 51.5 2-Core 277 75% 141 Pts	4-Core 526 8-Core 830 84% 678 Pts	64-Core 845 52% 845 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$245 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8592) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	61.1% Good	Lighting 68.3 Reflection 105 Parallax 89.2 56% 87.6 fps	MRender 88.5 Gravity 86.9 Splatting 87 72% 87.5 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 525GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1804 1508 1421 1383 1479 1532 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	327% Outstanding	Read 2,385 Write 1,889 Mixed 1,510 SusWrite 1,521 409% 1,826 MB/s	4K Read 47.8 4K Write 180 4K Mixed 71.4 259% 99.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,508 DQ Write 1,168 DQ Mixed 1,296 981% 1,324 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 327% Great: 410%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB 5,058 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 15GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 5.2 7.3 6.2 7 6.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	9.05% Terrible	Read 25.8 Write 17.5 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 5.8 16% 13.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0 49% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.05% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB-$169 37,519 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	MC Read 34.5 MC Write 38.2 MC Mixed 29.4 97% 34 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 38.8 SC Mixed 23.7 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 58.2 69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z270N-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270N-Gaming 5

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	56x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	27x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	23x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	12x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	7x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GBHyperX $169Bench 83%, 37,519 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $687

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16