HP 700-229c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 700-229c  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141031
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 05 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 225
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 568
59% 474 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1375) 2GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33% Below average
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 46
Parallax 41
34% 42.9 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 35.7
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 144 162 152 167 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 147
Write 159
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 158
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
289GB free
Firmware: 3.AHG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 81 81 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 78.3
Write 46.6
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 80.1
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 44%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 107 106 100 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 90.6
Write 102
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 106
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
161% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.5
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 17.8
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-229c Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-229c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback