Intel Eaglelake

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardIntel Eaglelake  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20090710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '21 at 18:42
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3220-$99
Socket 423, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 34.5
2-Core 69.1
40% 59 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 138
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
AMD(1002 2543) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.20903.8001
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 15.3
13% 16.6 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 10.1
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
736GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.00C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 49 44 41 40 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 94.2
Write 94.5
Mixed 45
SusWrite 46.1
51% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
129% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 62%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
6GB free, PID 0121
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.9 7.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 7.7
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 7.5
10% 8.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
20.9% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 6
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Eaglelake Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Intel Eaglelake

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback