TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI A320M PRO-VD/S (MS-7A36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A36
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VD/S (MS-7A36)  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '21 at 12:52
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X Eight-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 215
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 826
75% 628 Pts
64-Core 1,175
73% 1,175 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 79%
 Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$300
Gigabyte(1458 2338)
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.11.1
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 138
Parallax 232
97% 163 fps
MRender 226
Gravity 117
Splatting 150
132% 164 fps
Poor: 105% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 59 52 51 52 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 477
Mixed 311
SusWrite 85.1
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 46.1
161% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 174
182% 299 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 90.3%
 Great: 108%
Tph00301000gb 0 1TB
561GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 113 112 116 116 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 105
Write 109
Mixed 59
SusWrite 114
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 62.8%
 Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 32
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 27
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical A320M PRO-VD/S (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VD/S (MS-7A36)

CPU
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD  $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples125x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples62x
Ryzen 3 1200AMD  $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples60x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples109x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples50x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples34x
SSD
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples37x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples35x
Green 240GB (2018)WD  $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples12x
RAM
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples11x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $191
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback