QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory7.91GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.91GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.1 GB free of 7.90625 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '21 at 11:51
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5570
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 155
58% 100 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 269
40% 290 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 66%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 86GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 57 65 78 93 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.2% Poor
Read 212
Write 133
Mixed 201
SusWrite 68.4
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 9.5
36% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 16.7
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 13
10% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x7GB
1 of 1 slots used
7GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.8% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback