TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Aspire E5-575G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Ironman_SK
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateNov 05 '21 at 11:09
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 155
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 225
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 60.8%
 Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 940MX
Acer(1025 1094) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7196
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
9.95% Terrible
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 12.5
10% 13.4 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 8.9
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 9.95%
 Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-00007 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0206Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 203 201 183 184 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 471
Write 201
Mixed 150
SusWrite 189
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 21.7
102% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 56
98% 196 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 72.8%
 Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB Kingston KHX2666C15S4/8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.6% Good
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 20.5
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 18.5
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 60.6%
 Great: 72%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Aspire E5-575G Builds (Compare 3,088 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-575G

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples1,737x
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples466x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples381x
GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples1,536x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples606x
GeForce 940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 7,286 samples583x
SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples281x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples110x
RBUSNS8280S3128GH2 128GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,212 samples89x
RAM
ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 36%, 13,568 samples396x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 36%, 24,227 samples137x
ACR21D4S15HAG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 36%, 2,395 samples119x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback