Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	3.97GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.97GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	0.7 GB free of 3.96875 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '21 at 04:32
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	NCL-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 86 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 50.7 1-Core 51.8 2-Core 111 41% 71.1 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 287 36% 274 Pts	64-Core 282 17% 282 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Lighting 17.9 Reflection 18.1 Parallax 18.5 15% 18.2 fps	MRender 15.4 Gravity 19.3 Splatting 17.1 14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 83GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 876 Write 402 Mixed 596 138% 625 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 9.1 4K Mixed 11.3 42% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 245 180% 238 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x3GB 333 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1 of 1 slots used 3GB DIMM RAM Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 21.2 60% 21.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 10.4 26% 8.97 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16