Asus PRIME H510M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H510M-E  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210205
Uptime19.4 Days
Run DateNov 04 '21 at 22:33
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$234
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 167
2-Core 307
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 918
84% 703 Pts
64-Core 1,648
102% 1,648 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 216
Reflection 198
Parallax 188
176% 201 fps
MRender 235
Gravity 145
Splatting 123
132% 168 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 149%
Great: 170%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B9T6TB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1047 1005 972 1015 1034 841 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 2,216
Write 1,572
Mixed 1,488
SusWrite 986
349% 1,565 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 57.4
191% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1292
DQ Write 1,068
DQ Mixed 661
637% 1,007 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 260%
Great: 370%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2Z3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 23
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H510M-E Builds (Compare 6,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H510M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback