Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130 10,423 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 90.1 2-Core 179 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 429 46% 368 Pts	64-Core 434 27% 434 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 0647) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 9.3 Parallax 1.6 2% 4.33 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 152 150 152 151 151 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 454 Write 429 Mixed 375 SusWrite 185 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 32.2 106% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 358 272% 366 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 76.B396G.C7A0C 76.B396G.C7A0C 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 18 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	683x
GeForce GT 640MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,728 samples	84x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	73x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,522 samples	63x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19B 2x4GBAdataBench 52%, 544 samples	37x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 42%, 3,068 samples	28x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16