Lenovo 10GT002BUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10GT002BUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30D9
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '21 at 17:42
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4500-$37
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 217
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 219
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
XFX(1682 7240) 1GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 667 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.50.02
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 9
5% 7.93 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 5.3
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 9.4 24 10 40 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 430
Write 343
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 73.3
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
13% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 99%
V Series SATA SSD 120GB
42GB free
Firmware: V4.15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 349 362 215 130 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 413
Write 347
Mixed 287
SusWrite 251
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 16.9
98% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 30.1
54% 109 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD2 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10GT002BUK Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10GT002BUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback