Asrock X99 Extreme6/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme6/3.1  (all builds)
Memory60.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '21 at 14:49
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 104
2-Core 176
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 637
64% 519 Pts
64-Core 781
48% 781 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
31% Below average
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 36
Parallax 46.8
29% 39.5 fps
MRender 47.6
Gravity 44.8
Splatting 36.6
34% 43 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 439 430 433 425 431 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 440
Mixed 409
SusWrite 433
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 43
156% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 350
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9965600-012.A01G 9965600-005.A01G 9965600-005.A01G 9965600-005.A01G 64GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 38.2
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 19.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme6/3.1 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme6/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback