Asus X550CL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X550CL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550CL
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '21 at 23:06
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
40.9% Average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 55.9
2-Core 88.1
43% 67.9 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 130
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 124D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5100
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 2.6
3% 4.53 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 271 333 342 333 319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 307
Write 347
Mixed 330
SusWrite 316
74% 325 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 28.4
94% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 138
132% 210 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 12
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550CL Builds (Compare 467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550CL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback