TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus NovaGo TP370QL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus NovaGo TP370QL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK NovaGo TP370QL
Memory2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '21 at 20:30
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Snapdragon(TM) 835
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Memory 38.8
1-Core 19.6
2-Core 37.3
22% 31.9 Pts
4-Core 52.3
8-Core 81.2
8% 66.8 Pts
64-Core 77.5
5% 77.5 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 24.1%
 Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THGAF4T0N8LBAIRB 127GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 169 179 181 182 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 402
Write 178
Mixed 230
SusWrite 176
55% 246 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 17.3
57% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 131
101% 137 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 50.8%
 Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x6GB
1 of 1 slots used
6GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 10.8
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 40.2%
 Great: 201%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback