Asus P5G41T-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5G41T-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100729
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '21 at 16:31
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$131
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Memory 27
1-Core 10.5
2-Core 40.5
16% 26 Pts
4-Core 57.5
8-Core 77.2
8% 67.3 Pts
64-Core 91.8
6% 91.8 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 361C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 28.9
Reflection 40.2
Parallax 33.3
24% 34.1 fps
MRender 41.1
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 32.4
30% 37.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 48 50 95 53 53 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.1% Very poor
Read 110
Write 75
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 64.3
18% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 5.6
20% 6.47 MB/s
DQ Read 11.6
DQ Write 19.1
DQ Mixed 12.2
10% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 85%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
815GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 111 126 130 139 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 124
Write 46.7
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 127
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2.1
6% 2.03 GB/s
Latency 273
15% 273 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5G41T-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5G41T-M/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $131
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback