Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 1,823 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 55 1-Core 65.3 2-Core 176 53% 98.9 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 213 41% 282 Pts	64-Core 197 12% 197 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 1,242 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Acer(1025 1531) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	2.05% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 3 Parallax 4.2 2% 3.03 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 4 Splatting 3.9 3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.05% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00B00 256GB 338 User benchmarks, average bench 161% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 700 800 716 598 513 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 793 Write 792 Mixed 723 SusWrite 577 162% 721 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 22.7 4K Mixed 28 70% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 812 DQ Write 497 DQ Mixed 489 409% 599 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 224%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 2x4GB 16,220 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.5% Average	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 15.8 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 11.6 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Silver N6000IntelBench 34%, 1,823 samples	10x
Celeron N5100IntelBench 34%, 996 samples	1x
Celeron N4500IntelBench 28%, 1,026 samples	1x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 1,242 samples	10x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	1x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	1x

SSD
OM8PDP3256B-AA1 256GBKingstonBench 146%, 992 samples	6x
OM8PDP3128B-AA1 128GBKingstonBench 107%, 304 samples	2x
MZVLQ256HBJD-00B00 256GBSamsungBench 161%, 338 samples	1x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 1x4GBMicronBench 35%, 7,475 samples	4x
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 2x4GBMicronBench 68%, 16,220 samples	4x
HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 2x4GBHynixBench 71%, 7,522 samples	3x