TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '21 at 22:26
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 162
2-Core 323
106% 194 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,101
104% 859 Pts
64-Core 1,666
103% 1,666 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑
This bench: 106%
 Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$389
MSI(1462 3722) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 232
Parallax 189
138% 197 fps
MRender 193
Gravity 149
Splatting 127
125% 156 fps
Poor: 109% ↑
This bench: 127%
 Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$100
874GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 460 475 466 477 473 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 474
Mixed 391
SusWrite 471
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 48.6
172% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 276
227% 324 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 118%
 Great: 121%
WDC WDBNCE0010PNC 1TB
698GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 470 461 426 470 456 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 476
Mixed 390
SusWrite 460
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 49.2
172% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 273
225% 324 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 117%
 Great: 114%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
629GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2428 2226 1438 1454 1372 1188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
365% Outstanding
Read 2,629
Write 2,212
Mixed 1828
SusWrite 1,684
468% 2,088 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 96.9
320% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,570
DQ Write 987
DQ Mixed 1,242
936% 1,267 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑
This bench: 365%
 Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$103
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 30.3
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 30.9
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 51
78% 51 ns
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 114%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING - $383

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel  $224Bench 97%, 198,859 samples3,383x
Core i9-10900KIntel  $410Bench 100%, 107,269 samples2,482x
Core i9-10850KIntel  $279Bench 99%, 84,873 samples2,073x
GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia  $898Bench 187%, 424,051 samples1,757x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples1,083x
RTX 3090Nvidia  $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples893x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples1,358x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples831x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples523x
RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair  $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples610x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples372x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 90%, 46,140 samples308x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,714
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback