Acer TravelMate P277-MG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer TravelMate P277-MG  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TravelMate P277-MG
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime4.5 Days
Run DateNov 02 '21 at 20:39
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 109
50% 80.4 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 164
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Acer(1025 103E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
3.8% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 6
3% 7.07 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 6.6
5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.8%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 42 42 18 29 65 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.8% Above average
Read 200
Write 211
Mixed 195
SusWrite 43.5
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 23.4
106% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 145
127% 189 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 88%
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40
139GB free
Firmware: 2AJ100P5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 67 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 73.2
Write 41.1
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 66.3
42% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G 1302 PSD38G1600L2S 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 14.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P277-MG Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P277-MG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback