Hyrican GA-F2A78M-HD2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHyrican GA-F2A78M-HD2  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte F2A78M-HD2
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '21 at 09:55
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 65.7
2-Core 124
54% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 219
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 1TB-$700
913GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 368 357 356 366 365 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 391
Write 218
Mixed 267
SusWrite 361
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 25.8
96% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 188
157% 228 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2X4G64CB8HG5 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
23.6% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-HD2 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Hyrican GA-F2A78M-HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback