HP HPE-400tr

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP HPE-400tr  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateNov 02 '21 at 07:52
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 151
59% 100 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 205
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
HP(103C 6870) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 5
6% 6.3 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 5.3
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 240GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 109 106 102 98 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.3% Average
Read 240
Write 216
Mixed 217
SusWrite 125
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 13.3
71% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 29.5
59% 116 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 104%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
56GB free
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 115 132 118 114 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 225
Write 153
Mixed 174
SusWrite 116
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 23
90% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 119
93% 127 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.6% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-400tr Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: HP HPE-400tr

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback