Compaq-presario WE185AA-ABF CQ5321FR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemCompaq-presario WE185AA-ABF CQ5321FR  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Narra6
Memory3.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '21 at 07:46
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 215-$29
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 79.4
42% 63.9 Pts
4-Core 78.9
8-Core 79.4
11% 79.2 Pts
64-Core 78.7
5% 78.7 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
HP(103C 2A99) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8655
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 91 131 137 140 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 136
Write 146
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 121
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
22.6% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WE185AA-ABF CQ5321FR Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Compaq-presario WE185AA-ABF CQ5321FR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $29
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback