To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '21 at 06:26
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 187
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 695
62% 527 Pts
64-Core 877
54% 877 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 8354) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.67 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 78 32 57 37 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 472
Write 253
Mixed 327
SusWrite 64.6
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 1.2
51% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 38.6
DQ Mixed 24.6
42% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
229GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 112 100 107 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 188
Write 148
Mixed 88.1
SusWrite 108
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF51272PZ- 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
77.8% Very good
MC Read 33
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 26.8
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback