Asus P9X79 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory22 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '17 at 15:34
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 161
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 499
46% 387 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 3776) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Lighting 45.6
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 54.2
37% 47 fps
MRender 55.3
Gravity 52.4
Splatting 38.6
39% 48.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
623GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 524
Write 500
Mixed 512
114% 512 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 42.6
143% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 80.8
85% 140 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
547GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 505
Write 348
Mixed 359
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 26.5
120% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 62.4
71% 124 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 126%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$215
4.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 143
Write 157
Mixed 126
106% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.56
4K Mixed 0.29
109% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86%
Great: 98%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323
20GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 122
84% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.24
81% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 93%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323
11GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 114
Write 97.7
Mixed 91.4
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.24
81% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 93%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$175
7GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 58.4
Mixed 40.9
35% 46.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.17
74% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 98%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
10GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 129
Write 39.3
Mixed 48
75% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.72
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.47
66% 1.75 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1866 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 DELUXE Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 DELUXE - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $971
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback