Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '21 at 17:52
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 833
74% 626 Pts
64-Core 1,147
71% 1,147 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Gigabyte(1458 3501) 1GB
CLim: 815 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 5.2
13% 14.6 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 16.3
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z44106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1644 1678 1650 1705 1716 1725 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 1,853
Write 1,720
Mixed 1,358
SusWrite 1,686
372% 1,654 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 72.1
240% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 529
DQ Mixed 372
378% 627 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 285%
Great: 311%
WD Game Drive 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 93 92 93 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 92.8
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 92.2
120% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.7
297% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.3
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 21
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback