Medion E14409

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMedion E14409  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION SF40IL6
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210226
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateOct 31 '21 at 16:02
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 248
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 311
41% 310 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Device(1E39 A030) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
6.12% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 7.9
6% 6.6 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 10
7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.12%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NSN025SA328-P01Q1R0 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 473
Write 364
Mixed 335
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 20.5
96% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 36.4
74% 146 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 69%
Samsung PSSD T7 500GB
294GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4310
Write 42.1
Mixed 86.7
307% 1,480 MB/s
4K Read 413
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 5.6
635% 140 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 14.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E14409 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E14409

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback