Fujitsu D3161-B1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics79.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu D3161-B1  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3161-B1
Memory18.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 31 '21 at 13:13
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 190
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 363
45% 344 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.7% Very good
Lighting 99.1
Reflection 116
Parallax 101
81% 105 fps
MRender 98.6
Gravity 98.3
Splatting 89.5
78% 95.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 87%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 295 321 342 354 350 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 382
Write 315
Mixed 235
SusWrite 315
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 30.1
111% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 248
212% 311 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72AZ-1G9E1 Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 18JSF1G72AZ-1G9E1 Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.2% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical D3161-B1 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Fujitsu D3161-B1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $699
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback