| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 63.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Micro-Star GF65 Thin 10SDR |
| Motherboard | MSI MS-16W1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20201119 |
| Uptime | 1.7 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 31 '21 at 10:59 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
63.1%
Good
|
57% 95.6 Pts
|
44% 359 Pts
|
35% 566 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
MSI(1462 12AA) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9649
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
63.9%
Good
|
64% 89.7 fps
|
64% 79.8 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
61.1%
Good
|
62% 21.8 GB/s
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
46% 86.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MS-16W1 Builds (Compare 4,698 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI MS-16W1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples | 1,718x |
| Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples | 1,688x |
| Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples | 491x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples | 1,308x |
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 1,221x |
| GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples | 1,135x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |