Acer Aspire V3-771

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemAcer Aspire V3-771  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HC
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140423
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateAug 23 '17 at 01:08
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 154
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 210
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0686) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2653
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 2.78
3% 4.42 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.57
4% 4.98 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 189
Write 107
Mixed 113
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 10.3
69% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 30.5
45% 83.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 61%
Samsung MZMPA024HMCD-000 24GB
18GB free
Firmware: AXM2 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 239
Write 67.8
Mixed 99.6
29% 136 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 5.42
38% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 99.5
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 6.2
18% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 32%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55
668GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 89.1
Write 101
Mixed 95.2
72% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.21
73% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1L16BC4R1-B1PS 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 18.5
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-771 Builds (Compare 819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-771

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback