User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemECT
MotherboardASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z490-F GAMING
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 30 '21 at 14:56
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700KF-$200
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 80
1-Core 161
2-Core 318
99% 186 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 1,060
97% 814 Pts
64-Core 1,703
105% 1,703 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4786 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 496.49
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 143
Reflection 143
Parallax 143
116% 143 fps
Gravity 143
Splatting 143
127% 143 fps
Poor: 163% Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 594 293 295 287 268 253 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1469
Write 1237
Mixed 1,085
SusWrite 332
230% 1,031 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 73.5
253% 89 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 931
DQ Mixed 1,011
744% 973 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 200%
Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
21GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 473
Mixed 421
104% 465 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 58.3
196% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 353
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100
819GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 120 117 122 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 144
Write 130
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 120
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G KHX2133C14D4/8G KHX2400C15/8G KHX2400C15/8G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 20.9
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 21.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback