Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 10% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	7.53% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 900 3,169 User benchmarks, average bench 30% uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Memory 37.5 1-Core 7.2 2-Core 10.2 15% 18.3 Pts	4-Core 16.7 8-Core 19.7 2% 18.2 Pts	64-Core 23.2 1% 23.2 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0212) 797MB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.16% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.3 Parallax 0.4 0% 0.33 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.16% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14 42,288 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: P180831a SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 91 86 93 34 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	7.53% Terrible	Read 59.3 Write 67 Mixed 62 SusWrite 68.6 14% 64.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.2 3% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 7.53% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	8.43% Terrible	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.03 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 0.7 SC Mixed 0.3 1% 0.43 GB/s	Latency 214 19% 214 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.43% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 900IntelBench 30%, 3,169 samples	8x
Celeron Dual Core T3100IntelBench 34%, 976 samples	3x
Pentium T4200Intel $99Bench 34%, 5,474 samples	2x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	16x
Intel 45 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 1%, 2,404 samples	2x

SSD
SATA SSD 480GBKioxia-exceriaBench 78%, 7,893 samples	2x
Z400s 128GBSanDisk $109Bench 61%, 10,807 samples	1x
X400 2.5 7MM 256 256GBSandiskBench 72%, 39 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16