Asus WS C422 PRO_SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive322% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus WS C422 PRO_SE  (all builds)
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 30 '21 at 11:03
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2275
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 75.7
1-Core 147
2-Core 293
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 1,048
94% 795 Pts
64-Core 2,159
134% 2,159 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.39
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 18
Parallax 19.1
12% 17.1 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 15.3
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1723 2114 2129 1931 1869 1872 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 2,070
Write 2,009
Mixed 1,903
SusWrite 1,940
446% 1,980 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 76.7
243% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1133
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 991
744% 997 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 322%
Great: 477%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
918GB free
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1998 1959 1957 1966 1976 1931 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,069
Write 2,003
Mixed 1,920
SusWrite 1,964
449% 1,989 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 78.6
274% 99.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,237
DQ Write 962
DQ Mixed 1,086
816% 1,095 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 336%
Great: 477%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
34GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 49 60 54 99 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 204
Write 69.2
Mixed 101
SusWrite 59.4
126% 108 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.7
119% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-3G2J3 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 53.5
MC Mixed 35
125% 43.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 10.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS C422 PRO_SE Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS C422 PRO_SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 136% - Outstanding Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback