Asrock M3A780GXH/128M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock M3A780GXH/128M  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '21 at 04:20
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 47
2-Core 94.4
48% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 181
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.39
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.4% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 116
Parallax 116
102% 119 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 102
Splatting 87.7
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 84 117 110 125 139 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.5% Below average
Read 193
Write 94.1
Mixed 110
SusWrite 112
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 16
62% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16
DQ Write 25.4
DQ Mixed 19.5
15% 20.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M3A780GXH/128M Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock M3A780GXH/128M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $868
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback