Hp-pavilion GC674AA-ABA m8120n

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion GC674AA-ABA m8120n  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek Basswood3G
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070608
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 30 '21 at 01:37
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad-$90
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 71
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 55.6
36% 51.4 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 110
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
EVGA(3842 2619) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 0.4
2% 1.57 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.7
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 640GB
549GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 21 78 115 117 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 138
Write 129
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 83.8
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 120%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 192 201 197 178 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 130
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 190
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GC674AA-ABA m8120n Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion GC674AA-ABA m8120n

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback