Lenovo 82AS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82AS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2160 x 1350 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 30 '21 at 00:47
Run Duration265 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 225
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 397
46% 355 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F18) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.69% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 7.1
5% 6.93 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 5.8
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.69%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ512HALU-000L2 512GB
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AL2QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 174 168 167 149 170 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 522
Write 211
Mixed 206
SusWrite 166
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 45
177% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 472
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 318
229% 304 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 202%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.3% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 12
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82AS Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82AS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback