User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemEVGA E685 0.0
MotherboardEVGA EVGA E685
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '17 at 19:51
Run Duration79 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 206
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 506
53% 425 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.6.2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 68.8
39% 61.2 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 55.3
47% 58.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 252GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 659
Write 184
Mixed 137
239% 327 MB/s
4K Read 8.44
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 10.3
1,586% 7.79 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 242%
Great: 330%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-2133 CL11 4GB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2000 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.8% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 19.7
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback