Mousecomputer B5-R5RENAS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMousecomputer B5-R5RENAS  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer NL53RU
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200526
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateOct 29 '21 at 06:42
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 72.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 283
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 810
86% 687 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Clevo(1558 A500) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.40
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 19.9
12% 16.5 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 16.9
11% 13 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASU800NS38-256GTS-C 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 353 344 352 347 357 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 362
Mixed 360
SusWrite 346
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 44.2
145% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 224
174% 238 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 10.6
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback