Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X570DD
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191024
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateOct 29 '21 at 03:57
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 167
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 522
49% 407 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Asus(1043 1BB1) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44.05
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
25% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 31.6
26% 31.4 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 20.3
23% 29.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 135 117 41 34 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 462
Write 348
Mixed 337
SusWrite 108
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 27.6
105% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 173
142% 201 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 91%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
724GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 110 103 110 110 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 125
Write 84.9
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 107
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.3
166% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P26KC8T1-BBSS Kingston 9905624-058.A00G 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 27.1
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 21.7
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X570DD_X570DD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback