Asus P5N-E SLI

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P5N-E SLI (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '21 at 00:05
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$115 20,482 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Memory 14.7 1-Core 28.6 2-Core 69.4 19% 37.6 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 129 17% 126 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180 23,273 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1005 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 16.3 Reflection 28.4 Parallax 15.6 13% 20.1 fps	MRender 25.1 Gravity 17.8 Splatting 16.3 16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU 650 120GB 342 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: XD0R SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 92 85 96 98 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.5% Below average	Read 92.4 Write 95.6 Mixed 93.8 SusWrite 90 21% 92.9 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 34.1 4K Mixed 24 83% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 23.6 DQ Write 49.6 DQ Mixed 30.5 25% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 82%
Excelsto r Technology 160GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 145GB free Firmware: P22O SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 74 73 74 73 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 72.7 Write 68.5 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 72.7 47% 64.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 42%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA 250GB 157 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 232GB free Firmware: JP1O SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 91 89 94 95 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 111 Write 88.4 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 89.3 64% 86.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 70%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA 160GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 149GB free Firmware: P22O SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 75 74 76 75 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 75.5 Write 73.1 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 74.7 49% 66.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	8.26% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 2.3 8% 2.93 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 1.3 5% 1.73 GB/s	Latency 362 11% 362 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 8.26% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5N-E SLI Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-E SLI

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	19x
Core2 Duo E6750IntelBench 38%, 9,456 samples	12x
Core2 Duo E8600Intel $180Bench 44%, 6,109 samples	7x

GPU
GeForce 8800 GTXNvidiaBench 6%, 1,377 samples	7x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	6x
GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples	4x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	5x
0 500GBCt500mx5Bench 92%, 2,476 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	32x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	14x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $195

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16