HP ProBook 645 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProBook 645 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80FE
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '21 at 18:59
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-8700B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
U4500, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 39.6
2-Core 74.9
36% 56.4 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 98.8
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 88.1
6% 88.1 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 80FE) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.09.04.01
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 7.7
4% 6.13 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000H1 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT22H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 148 143 149 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 409
Write 151
Mixed 172
SusWrite 149
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 20
82% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 143
109% 147 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.6% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 645 G2 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 645 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback