Medion MD34173/C719

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMedion MD34173/C719  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION Z370H4-EM
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '21 at 12:45
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 207
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 661
66% 536 Pts
64-Core 879
54% 879 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Elitegroup(1019 1042) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.8% Poor
Lighting 31.2
Reflection 36.9
Parallax 30.9
25% 33 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 30.8
Splatting 21.9
24% 30 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 83 86 48 28 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 614
Write 360
Mixed 433
SusWrite 92.5
83% 375 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 45.8
165% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 22.1
57% 119 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
395GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 159 164 163 163 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 168
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 160
95% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34173/C719 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Medion MD34173/C719

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback