Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T-$165 5,709 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	41.4% Average	Memory 62 1-Core 41.2 2-Core 76 39% 59.7 Pts	4-Core 117 8-Core 156 17% 136 Pts	64-Core 173 11% 173 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 3506) 1GB CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	3.39% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 6.2 Parallax 1.9 3% 4.03 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 4.6 Splatting 3.4 4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.39% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 116 51 74 47 42 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.4% Below average	Read 186 Write 128 Mixed 141 SusWrite 75.3 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 25 72% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 35.9 DQ Write 74.4 DQ Mixed 41.9 36% 50.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	20.8% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 8 21% 7.33 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Sempron X2 190AMDBench 40%, 154 samples	2x
Athlon II X2 270AMD $20Bench 43%, 6,369 samples	2x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 9800 GTNvidiaBench 5%, 19,550 samples	1x
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	1x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	1x

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $400

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16