Gigabyte GA-MZGLKDP-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MZGLKDP-00  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '21 at 23:12
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4105
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 41.6
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 105
38% 66.8 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 210
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Gigabyte(1458 1000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9955
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.53% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2.6
2% 2.5 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.53%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 3.3 27 93 56 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 341
Write 280
Mixed 258
SusWrite 70.3
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 10.8
46% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 44.5
48% 82.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD44G240081S 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.4% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MZGLKDP-00 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MZGLKDP-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $15
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback