Asrock 760GM-HD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 760GM-HD  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores, 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '21 at 21:27
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 57.6
37% 53.8 Pts
4-Core 86.2
8-Core 84.5
12% 85.3 Pts
64-Core 90.3
6% 90.3 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1205 MHz, MLim: 1558 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
13.1% Very poor
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 51.4
6% 33.4 fps
MRender 35.3
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 29.3
28% 34.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 47 36 45 52 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 98.7
Write 104
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 52.6
58% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$78
267GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 62 65 67 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 74.5
Write 59.3
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 62
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 41%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
201GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 62 65 67 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
37% Below average
Read 67.3
Write 57.8
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 61.7
41% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 37%
Great: 39%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-08U6AA0 500GB
177GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 22 23 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 24
Write 23
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 22
31% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/8G000 KRE-D3U1600M/8G000 16GB
333, 333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
28.8% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.7
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-HD Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback