Alienware M14xR2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware M14xR2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware M14xR2
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '21 at 05:56
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 149
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 203
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
Dell(1028 0552) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9125
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.69% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 10.7
6% 9.23 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 8.6
8% 9.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.69%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 32GB
30GB free
Firmware: CXM13D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 357
Write 85.8
Mixed 131
SusWrite 84.1
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 13.7
53% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 34
DQ Mixed 59.2
58% 96.9 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
661GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 61 57 76 79 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 86.7
Write 85
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 69.5
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
109% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M14xR2 Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M14xR2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback